Blog

Starting a Goal-Driven Patient-Reported Outcomes Program: 5 Steps to Launch

Jan 3, 2018 12:00:00 PM

Nurse writing on a clipboard in a hospital

Three fundamental goals should stand out when starting a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) program. First, you are determined to evaluate care by including outcomes based on the patient’s viewpoint along with other clinical measures. Longitudinally tracking patient assessment of pain and function can provide insights into the effectiveness of hip and knee arthroplasty across a much broader patient population than the relatively small number of patients that suffer implant failures and require surgery.

Second, you are determined to enable your institution’s provision of PRO data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and other payers as they continue defining quality measures for value-based reimbursement. For example, CMS defines PRO requirements within their Medicare reimbursement programs such as Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model and the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). MIPS recently replaced the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). The demand for PRO data by regulators, payers, accreditors, and professional organizations has accelerated, as patient care associated with PRO programs has demonstrated improvement. Better technology for data capture has also accelerated demand.  

Finally, you are determined to use comparative data and PRO benchmarking to provide evidence for needed quality improvement work at both the hospital and surgeon level. National Registry data is often used to enable this effort.

 

If these goals are important to your institution, the five steps shared below will help you launch a successful PRO program:

 

Step #1 – Identify Your Institution’s Key Contributing Stakeholders to PRO Program Development

Launching a PRO program will require a multidisciplinary group within your institution to drive and implement the program. Below is a list of potential key stakeholders who may assist in developing and capturing PROMs for your institution:

  • Physician Leadership
  • Orthopaedic Department
  • Related Practice Groups and Clinics
  • Quality Department
  • Information Technology
  • Orthopaedic Service Line
  • Research
  • Rehabilitation
  • Hospital Administration
  • Patient Advocate(s)

 

Step #2 – Define Your PRO Program Goals

The goals driving implementation of your PRO program, beyond the fundamental three discussed above, can differ by institution. Community hospitals and academic medical centers, for example, have some different needs to address. Key questions that can guide your goal setting choices include:

  • Are we launching research initiatives?
  • Are we seeking comparative benchmarks nationally, locally?
  • Are we quantifying our outcomes from the patients’ perspective?
  • Do we want to measure overall health improvement?
  • Will patient provided data be used in the clinical encounter?
  • Will PROs be used to evaluate quality initiatives?
  • What are the requirements of the payer-specific program(s) for which we hope to qualify?

Discover here why you should include a PRO program at your institution.

 

Step #3 – Determine the Appropriate PRO Measure(s) and Timeline

Your reasons for implementing a PRO program will direct your team to the use of certain instruments that will meet the needs of the program’s goals. For example: if you are collecting PROMs for research initiatives, you may choose longer instruments like the HOOS and KOOS, which provide multiple subscales on pain, function, symptoms, etc., that will give a depth of data to address many research hypotheses. If you are focused on measuring patient outcomes as part of clinical care or your research is focused on a specific defined domain (e.g., pain or function), shorter instruments like the HOOS, JR. and KOOS, JR. will work. How often you need to measure change becomes your timeline for data collection. The International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement (ICHOM) recommends a pre-op baseline and then a one year follow-up for data collection. CMS’ CJR Final Rule defines frequency of data collection similarly.  

 

Step #4 – Develop Workflow for Data Capture

Once you have determined the purpose of PRO data collection, which measures to collect, and your timeline for data capture, you can develop the protocol for data collection. An important and early decision will be choosing a PRO collection tool capable of tracking complete data, presenting PROs in the context of an individual surgeon, surgical approach, implant, etc. This attention to context greatly improves the utility of your data and the ability to interpret it. You can refer to A Buyer’s Guide to Orthopedic Patient-Reported Outcome Collection Tools for help in determining which type of PRO collection tool best meets your needs. For example, does the tool adequately address reporting compliance, data validity, quality improvement, and patient safety considerations. Who owns the completed data after it is submitted by the patient? Are reports produced by you or a vendor? The diagram in the link below maps a PROM collection to action workflow that can be used to help review various electronic-based collection tools you are considering.

 

View a workflow diagram for electronic-based PROMs survey administration.

 

Step #5 – Interpretation of PRO Results

It is important to understand what domain the PROM is measuring and how it is scored in order to be able to utilize it appropriately, especially if it is to be shared with patients. Additionally, it is essential to be aware of how clinical significant change in scores between patients or within patients over time is defined and analyzed.

“Clinically significant change has been defined as changes in patient functioning that are meaningful for individuals who undergo psychosocial or medical interventions. Similarly, meaningful change is defined (from patient perspective) as one that results in a meaningful reduction in symptoms or improvement in function.” (Cella D. Hahn E.A.)

In PRO data reporting, minimally important differences (MIDs) represent a specific approach to measure clinical significance. They are defined as “the smallest difference in score in the outcome of interest that informed patients or informed proxies perceive as important. Although this statistical method may be necessary to utilize when reporting scores, it may vary by population and by context and some PROMs may already have known thresholds or meaningful cut points.

Therefore, the three main concepts to think about when interpreting PROM results are:

  • Know the domain that is being measured and label it correctly
  • Understanding the score and its meaning
  • Understand the meaningful thresholds like MIDS and cut points (mild/moderate/severe impairment)

Further review of these statistical concepts may be necessary by those using a PRO program as they utilize PRO data.

 

Refer to lessons from peer focus groups when starting a patient-reported outcomes program

 

Next Week: Wednesday, January 10, 2018  -  Monitoring PRO Quality Measures: 5 Government Initiatives to Watch

 

Get the AJRR PROMs Guide

 

Be sure to leave a comment in the form below!

 

Topics: Patient-Reported Outcomes

A Message for Our Readers

This blog was created by the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR), part of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' (AAOS) registries portfolio. The blog is part of our commitment to improve orthopaedic care through the collection, analysis, and reporting of actionable hip and knee arthroplasty data. Our purpose is to communicate with others in the orthopaedic field who share the same commitment. Watch for weekly news alerts, quick tips, actionable checklists, best practices, and research findings posted to this blog. It will be information you can use each week!

The more interactive you are, the greater the value shared. Visit us at www.AJRR.net, speak with a Business Development Representative at 847-292-0530, or follow us on Twitter.

Subscribe to Email Updates

This Week's Blog

How to Build a Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) Program for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty is a 4-part blogging series:

  • Wednesday, January 3, 2018 – Starting a Goal-Driven Patient-Reported Outcomes Program: 5 Steps to Launch
  • Wednesday, January 10, 2018 – Monitoring PRO Quality Measures: 5 Government Initiatives to Watch
  • Wednesday, January 17, 2018 – PRO Data Collection and Reporting: 5 Workflow Features to Implement
  • Wednesday, January 24, 2018 – PRO Data Interpretation: 5 Analytic Resources and Tools to Consider

This Week's References

 

 

 

Learn About AJRR, RegistryInsights,™ and the PRO Module

AJRR’s RegistryInsights™ platform, including a patient-reported outcomes (PROs) module that allows hospitals, surgery centers, and practice groups to administer and analyze PROs, is available to Registry participants. The module can collect both preoperatively and postoperatively to gain insights into patients’ outcomes on a large scale. For information about joining AJRR, speak with a Business Development Representative at (847) 292-0530.  Request an AJRR Demo

Recent Posts

Disclaimer

This blog shares health care information from a variety of independent expert sources. Some sources offer opinions that may be of interest to other professionals facing similar challenges. Our approach helps ensure diverse, well-rounded presentation of important, often complex health care content. Shared content does not necessarily represent AJRR or AAOS findings and practices.